<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 5 pitfalls of estimating a software project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattberther.com/2004/06/23/the-5-pitfalls-of-estimating-a-software-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattberther.com/2004/06/23/the-5-pitfalls-of-estimating-a-software-project/</link>
	<description>Agile Manager and Occasional Code Monkey</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:01:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: georg</title>
		<link>http://www.mattberther.com/2004/06/23/the-5-pitfalls-of-estimating-a-software-project/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>georg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2004 09:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattberther.com/blog/?p=496#comment-566</guid>
		<description>hallo friends. really nice here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hallo friends. really nice here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georg</title>
		<link>http://www.mattberther.com/2004/06/23/the-5-pitfalls-of-estimating-a-software-project/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>georg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2004 08:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattberther.com/blog/?p=496#comment-565</guid>
		<description>hallo friends. really nice here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hallo friends. really nice here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meryl's notes</title>
		<link>http://www.mattberther.com/2004/06/23/the-5-pitfalls-of-estimating-a-software-project/comment-page-1/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>meryl's notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattberther.com/blog/?p=496#comment-567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Five Pitfalls to Estimating a Software Project&lt;/strong&gt;

Matt Berther points to a thought-provoking entry by Christopher Hawkins who knows how to produce an accurate estimate and shares what to avoid when doing the estimates for a project....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Five Pitfalls to Estimating a Software Project</strong></p>
<p>Matt Berther points to a thought-provoking entry by Christopher Hawkins who knows how to produce an accurate estimate and shares what to avoid when doing the estimates for a project&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://www.mattberther.com/2004/06/23/the-5-pitfalls-of-estimating-a-software-project/comment-page-1/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2004 20:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattberther.com/blog/?p=496#comment-564</guid>
		<description>Hi, Matt!  

First off, thanks for the mention.

Second, I agree with you on this bit:

&quot;It&#039;s not necessary to have a complete functional specification prior to starting development of an application. Using XP, there is a consensus on a small set of functionality that will be delivered (the simplest thing that could possibly work) and those requirements are generated. If these requirements are inadequate or unclear, then immediate clarification is obtained from the customer, so that work can continue.&quot;

I usually outline the overall application and then develop detailed specs for one feature or task cluster at a time, making sure it is as unambiguous as possible before proceeding.

Now, I&#039;ll admit that I would prefer to be able to spec the whole system up front, but I&#039;ve found that even with the most diligent requirements gathering practices, clients invariably have epiphanies along the way that change the way they want to treat business processes, which of course means they want to change the tools supporting those processes.

Thanks again.  I&#039;ll be reading your blog.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Matt!  </p>
<p>First off, thanks for the mention.</p>
<p>Second, I agree with you on this bit:</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s not necessary to have a complete functional specification prior to starting development of an application. Using XP, there is a consensus on a small set of functionality that will be delivered (the simplest thing that could possibly work) and those requirements are generated. If these requirements are inadequate or unclear, then immediate clarification is obtained from the customer, so that work can continue.&#8221;</p>
<p>I usually outline the overall application and then develop detailed specs for one feature or task cluster at a time, making sure it is as unambiguous as possible before proceeding.</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;ll admit that I would prefer to be able to spec the whole system up front, but I&#8217;ve found that even with the most diligent requirements gathering practices, clients invariably have epiphanies along the way that change the way they want to treat business processes, which of course means they want to change the tools supporting those processes.</p>
<p>Thanks again.  I&#8217;ll be reading your blog.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
